Extracting verified decision procedures: DPLL and Resolution
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article is concerned with the application of the program extraction technique to a new class of problems: the synthesis of decision procedures for the classical satisfiability problem that are correct by construction. To this end, we formalize a completeness proof for the DPLL proof system and extract a SAT solver from it. When applied to a propositional formula in conjunctive normal form the program produces either a satisfying assignment or a DPLL derivation showing its unsatisfiability. We use non-computational quantifiers to remove redundant computational content from the extracted program and translate it into Haskell to improve performance. We also prove the equivalence between the resolution proof system and the DPLL proof system with a bound on the size of the resulting resolution proof. This demonstrates that it is possible to capture quantitative information about the extracted program on the proof level. The formalization is carried out in the interactive proof assistant Minlog.
منابع مشابه
Extracting (Easily) Checkable Proofs from a Satisfiability Solver that Employs both Preorder and Postorder Resolution
In many applications the desired outcome of satisfiability checking is that the formula is unsatisfiable: A satisfying assignment essentially exhibits a bug and unsatisfiability implies a lack of bugs, at least for the property being verified. Current high-performance satisfiability checkers are unable to provide proof of unsatisfiability. Since bugs have been discovered in many solvers long af...
متن کاملA Parameterized Complexity of DPLL Search Procedures
We study the performance of DPLL algorithms on parameterized problems. In particular, we investigate how difficult it is to decide whether small solutions exist for satisfiability and other combinatorial problems. For this purpose we develop a Prover-Delayer game which models the running time of DPLL procedures and we establish an information-theoretic method to obtain lower bounds to the runni...
متن کاملMaster research Internship Master Thesis Formalisation of Ground Inference Systems in a Proof Assistant
Various methods have been developed for solving SAT problems, notably resolution, the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland-Procedure procedure (DPLL) and an extension of it, the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL). We have formalised these three algorithms in a proof assistant Isabelle/HOL, based on a chapter of Christoph Weidenbach’s upcoming book Automed Reasoning – The Art of Generic Problem So...
متن کاملOn Interpolation in Decision Procedures
Interpolation means finding intermediate formulae between given formulae. When formulae decorate program locations, and describe sets of program states, interpolation may enable a program analyzer to discover information about intermediate locations and states. This mechanism has an increasing number of applications, that are relevant to program analysis and synthesis. We study interpolation in...
متن کاملOn the Relative Efficiency of DPLL and OBDDs with Axiom and Join
This paper studies the relative efficiency of ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) and the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure (DPLL), two of the main approaches to solving Boolean satisfiability instances. Especially, we show that OBDDs, even when constructed using only the rather weak axiom and join rules, can be exponentially more efficient than DPLL or, equivalently, tree-like reso...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Logical Methods in Computer Science
دوره 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013